Intelligence dispatch / AZ-2026-7893
Safest Neighborhoods in San Francisco: Crime Data & Map
Compare low-crime San Francisco neighborhoods, see property vs. violent crime trends, and check block-level risks with data through June.

A San Francisco block can change fast after dark. One route home feels quiet and residential. A few miles away, the police file gets loud.
This page points to the calmer side of the map. The clearest low-crime pattern sits along the west side, the coast, and parts of the southern hills. The safest group in this file is Outer Sunset, Inner Sunset, Outer Richmond, Inner Richmond, Sea Cliff, Noe Valley, Glen Park, and West of Twin Peaks.
Property crime is still the main story. That matters because a neighborhood can feel calm at night and still log theft, burglary, or car break-ins.
The split is sharpest when SoMa enters the frame. In 2025, SoMa logged about 102 property crimes per 1,000 residents and 41 violent crimes per 1,000. The eight neighborhoods above sit well below that line, with violent crime often under 5 per 1,000 residents in the lower-rate areas.
A simple read of the map looks like this:
- Best low-crime cluster: western and coastal neighborhoods
- Best hill options: Noe Valley, Glen Park, and West of Twin Peaks
- Lowest violent-crime standouts: Glen Park and Noe Valley
- Main tradeoff: quieter streets often mean higher housing costs, longer commutes, or less nightlife
The short verdict: if the goal is a calmer residential setting, the western edge and the hills give the cleanest signal.
A few cautions stay in the file:
- Low crime does not mean no crime
- Property crime remains more common than violent crime
- Small-population neighborhoods can swing on a handful of reports
- Public crime maps leave out about 6% of reports that stay confidential
That is why the neighborhood name is only the first filter. The safer move is to check the exact block, parking situation, transit walk, and nearby retail strip before signing a lease or booking a stay.
The pattern itself is plain. As the city moves away from the downtown core, the record often cools off. The ocean side gets quieter. The hill neighborhoods thin out. The noise drops.
For a practical read, the safest picks in this group break down like this:
| Neighborhood | What stands out | Main watchout |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Sunset | Low recorded crime, quiet residential grid | Car break-ins still happen |
| Inner Sunset | Low crime with better walkability | Parking pressure near busier edges |
| Outer Richmond | Calm residential feel | Longer trip to downtown job centers |
| Inner Richmond | Lower crime than citywide | Retail pockets can shift block feel |
| Sea Cliff | Very low violent crime | Small area, very high housing costs |
| Noe Valley | Low violent crime, family-heavy streets | Theft still shows up |
| Glen Park | One of the lowest violent-crime rates in the group | Small totals can shift fast |
| West of Twin Peaks | Quiet, suburban feel inside city limits | More car dependence |
The numbers help, but the street matters more. A calm neighborhood average can hide one noisy corridor. A higher-rate area can still contain quiet blocks.
Check the address, not just the label. Use neighborhood patterns as the first screen, then verify the exact spot with the local crime map, nearby intersections, and recent police records.
Record note: the article uses San Francisco police reports from 01/01/2026 to 06/30/2026, checked on 08/24/2026. Rates are based on reported incidents per 1,000 residents.
1. Outer Sunset
Total Crime Rate
Outer Sunset lands in the city's "Low" crime tier. [1] On San Francisco's western edge, where the grid runs toward the ocean and the streets thin into quieter blocks, that puts this neighborhood among the city's lower-crime areas.
Violent vs. Property Mix
Across San Francisco, most police reports fall on the property side. Outer Sunset stays near the lower end of the city's range on both property crime and violent crime. [4]
Gap From the Citywide Average
The neighborhood sits well below the city average. [4] It also fits the western perimeter pattern: fewer recorded incidents than the denser central districts where the city's noise tends to collect. [4] [5] [6]
Data Limits
Small totals can swing hard from one period to the next, so percentage jumps here can look bigger than the street-level change feels. [1] Public map pins also point to nearby intersections, not exact addresses. [1]
One more blind spot sits in the file: about 6% of SFPD reports do not appear in public datasets because the records are confidential or sensitive, based on 2020 figures. [1]
For a closer block-by-block and ZIP-level read, check Aden's ZIP. The same low-crime pattern continues into the next Sunset and Richmond neighborhoods.
sbb-itb-6d427fc
2. Inner Sunset
Total Crime Rate
Inner Sunset sits in San Francisco's "Low" crime tier in the Jan. 1–Jun. 30, 2026 SFPD records checked Aug. 24, 2026. [1] On the map, this part of the city stays quiet. Both major crime categories run low here, with property crime making up most reports and violent crime staying especially rare.
Violent vs. Property Mix
Most recorded incidents fall on the property side, led by larceny theft. [4] Violent crime barely registers by comparison. In 2025, Inner Sunset's violent crime rate stayed below 5 incidents per 1,000 residents. [4]
That is far from the city's hardest-hit areas. SoMa recorded 41 violent crimes per 1,000 residents in the same year. [4] The distance between those two numbers says a lot. Inner Sunset remains well outside San Francisco's highest-crime zones.
Gap From the Citywide Average
Inner Sunset's property crime rate lands among the city's lowest, in the same group as the Presidio and Sea Cliff. [4][5] That places it on the calmer end of the city file.
The contrast sharpens with SoMa. In 2025, SoMa's property crime rate reached 102 incidents per 1,000 residents. [4] The next western district follows the same low-crime pattern.
Use Aden's ZIP for block- and ZIP-level checks in Inner Sunset.
3. Outer Richmond
Total Crime Rate
In the first half of 2026, Outer Richmond held a "Low" crime classification.[1] The neighborhood sits on San Francisco’s western edge, where the city thins out toward the ocean and police reports usually run lower than they do in the denser central districts.[4][6]
Violent vs. Property Mix
Most reports in Outer Richmond fall on the property side. Larceny theft, burglary, and motor vehicle theft lead the file, while violent incidents stay limited mostly to assault and robbery and remain near the low end of the city range.[1]
Gap From the Citywide Average
Against San Francisco as a whole, Outer Richmond stays well below average and far from the city’s highest-crime zones. SoMa sits on the other end of the map, while Outer Richmond remains one of the city’s lower-rate residential districts, alongside Outer Sunset, Sea Cliff, and West Portal.[4][6]
One caution belongs in the record: small totals can swing rates fast. A single retail site can shift the percentage more than the street-level picture suggests.[4][1]
Check Aden's ZIP for block- and ZIP-level detail before moving or renting.
Next, Inner Richmond continues the same low-crime pattern.
4. Inner Richmond
Total Crime Rate
Inner Richmond sits just east of Outer Richmond and stays inside the same quieter western stretch of San Francisco. The record is lighter here than in much of the city, with fewer reported incidents than San Francisco overall. [4][6]
Violent vs. Property Mix
Most of the police record here comes from property crime. The main entries are larceny theft, bicycle theft, motor vehicle parts theft, shoplifting, and burglary. [4]
Violent crime stays below 10 incidents per 1,000 residents. That is far below SoMa, which stands at 41 per 1,000 in 2025. [4]
Gap From the Citywide Average
San Francisco's citywide crime index is 102, above the national average. Inner Richmond stays well below that mark. [6]
Sea Cliff, farther northwest, shows the same quieter pattern.
San Francisco Neighborhoods Ranked From WORST to BEST
5. Sea Cliff
Sea Cliff carries that same low-crime pattern farther into the northwest edge of the city.
Total Crime Rate
In the Jan. 1–Jun. 30, 2026 SFPD records checked on Aug. 24, 2026, Sea Cliff falls into San Francisco’s "Low" crime category.[1] The file stays quiet by city standards, and most of what appears in it is property crime rather than violence.
Violent vs. Property Mix
The pattern is plain. Property crime makes up most of the recorded trouble here, while violent crime remains near the bottom of the city’s range. Violent crime stays below 5 incidents per 1,000 residents, and property crime also sits in the city’s lowest tier.[4]
Gap From the Citywide Average
The contrast with SoMa is stark. In 2025, SoMa recorded 41 violent crimes per 1,000 residents and 102 property crimes per 1,000 residents - well above Sea Cliff.[4]
One caution sits under the surface: Sea Cliff has a small population. That means a handful of incidents can move the rate more than they would in a larger neighborhood.[1][4]
The next neighborhood shows much the same pattern, with similarly low totals.
6. Noe Valley
In SFPD records covering Jan. 1–Jun. 30, 2026, with updates posted July 14, 2026, Noe Valley still sits among San Francisco’s safest neighborhoods.[1][4]
Violent vs. Property Mix
Most reports here fall on the property side, with larceny theft leading the file. Violent crime stays low. In the 2025 neighborhood snapshot, Noe Valley came in below 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents.[4]
Gap From the Citywide Average
That sits under the city rate of about 5.4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents.[6] The distance grows stark against the city’s hardest-hit districts: SoMa recorded 41 violent crimes per 1,000 residents in 2025, while the Tenderloin recorded 37.[4]
Small counts can move the picture fast. A handful of incidents can shift the rate.[1][4]
For a closer street check, use Aden's ZIP to review block- and ZIP-level patterns in Noe Valley.
Glen Park shows a similar low-crime pattern.
7. Glen Park
Glen Park reads as a quiet residential pocket, and the police file stays light. In the Jan. 1–Jun. 30, 2026 SFPD records, it posts one of the lowest reported crime rates in San Francisco.
Violent vs. Property Mix
The split is clear. Glen Park records 152 violent incidents and 2,076 property crimes per 100,000 residents, which means about 93% of reported crime is property-related.
Most of those property reports fall into familiar city patterns: larceny theft, burglary, and motor vehicle theft.[2] Violent reports are mostly assault and robbery, and they remain near the city's low end.[1][4]
Gap From the Citywide Average
Against the city as a whole, Glen Park stays well below the line. San Francisco's annual odds stand at 1 in 184 for violent crime and 1 in 32 for property crime.[6]
One boundary note matters here. Population counts shift depending on where the map draws Glen Park, from 6,837 to 9,165 residents, so the per-person rate moves with the boundary used.[6][7]
For a closer street check, use Aden's ZIP to review block- and ZIP-level patterns in Glen Park. West of Twin Peaks follows next.
8. West of Twin Peaks
West of Twin Peaks follows the same quiet pattern seen across much of San Francisco's western edge. With 22,608 residents, it stands among the city's safer residential areas.
Violent vs. Property Mix
In 2025, West of Twin Peaks ranked within the 40% of San Francisco neighborhoods with fewer than 5 reported violent crimes per 1,000 residents. Property crime also stayed below the city average.[4][6]
Gap From the Citywide Average
The city file stays calm here. West of Twin Peaks remains below San Francisco's averages for both violent and property crime, with an A safety rating against the city's C- overall.[6] As of July 14, 2026, the neighborhood still reads as low-crime.[1]
One warning sits in the margins: when the total number of reports is small, even a slight shift in filings can make the percentage change look big.[1][4]
For a neighborhood- or ZIP-level look at West of Twin Peaks, Aden's ZIP offers free reports.
Next, the citywide comparison shows how these neighborhoods stack up against San Francisco overall.
How These Neighborhoods Compare With San Francisco Overall
Outer Sunset, Inner Sunset, Outer Richmond, Inner Richmond, Sea Cliff, Noe Valley, Glen Park, and West of Twin Peaks all sit below San Francisco’s citywide baseline. The pattern is clearest on the west side and in the hills, where the city tends to quiet down after dark. In 2025, 40% of San Francisco neighborhoods had violent crime rates of fewer than 5 incidents per 1,000 residents.[4]
The split makes sense on the street. These areas are mostly residential, with fewer retail clusters and fewer transit pressure points than SoMa. That shows up in the records: western and hill neighborhoods have fewer of the retail nodes that tend to pull in theft downtown. At Fourth and Mission alone, reports accounted for roughly one-third of SoMa larceny thefts in 2025.[4]
| Area | Geography | Key point | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco Overall | Citywide | Most neighborhoods had violent crime rates under 10 per 1,000 residents in 2025.[4] | Baseline |
| Western and coastal neighborhoods (Outer Sunset, Inner Sunset, Outer Richmond, Inner Richmond, Sea Cliff) | Primarily residential | They post some of the city’s lowest property-crime rates, and violent crime stays very low.[4] | Among the safest residential areas |
| Hill neighborhoods (Noe Valley, Glen Park, West of Twin Peaks) | Residential hills | Violent crime is very low, and property crime also runs low across the group.[4] | Safer than citywide |
| SoMa (reference) | Downtown/mixed-use | 41 violent crimes and 102 property crimes per 1,000 residents in 2025; larceny theft clusters at a few hotspots.[4] | Highest-crime reference area |
Three limits sit in the file.
- Low violent crime does not mean zero property crime.
- Resident-based rates can make busy commercial districts look calmer than they feel on the ground, while making small-population areas look a bit hotter.
- About 6% of reports are excluded from public datasets.[1]
Those limits shape the tradeoffs in the next section.
For address-level checks, Aden's ZIP offers free address-level reports.
Pros and Cons
Street by street, the pattern is plain: calmer neighborhoods often ask for a longer ride, fewer late-night options, or a higher price tag.
| Neighborhood | Main Safety Advantage | Main Caution | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outer Sunset | Car break-ins still occur; heavy fog | Far from downtown | Families |
| Inner Sunset | Walkable residential streets[4] | Parking pressure near Golden Gate Park | Renters/students |
| Outer Richmond | Residential calm[4] | Longer commute to Financial District or SoMa | Professionals |
| Inner Richmond | Quiet residential blocks[4] | One retailer can swing the rate[1] | Families |
| Sea Cliff | One of the lowest violent crime rates citywide[4] | Very expensive; occasional property theft | Luxury buyers |
| Noe Valley | Family-oriented streets; BART-accessible hills[4] | Expensive; package theft risk; quiet at night | Families/professionals |
| Glen Park | Low incident counts; BART access[4] | Small population; one bad month can skew the rate | Commuters |
| West of Twin Peaks | Suburban feel within city limits[4] | Car-dependent; limited transit options | Families |
Small counts can swing rates, so the safer read is the total number of incidents, not percentages alone.[1][4]
That trade shows up again and again across the west side and the hills. The streets tend to run quieter. Downtown gets farther away. Nightlife thins out. Commutes stretch.
For a block-level check, match the neighborhood pattern against the map and city records. Start with Aden's neighborhood and ZIP pages, then verify with the SFPD Crime Dashboard, DataSF heat map, and CompStat reports.
Conclusion
The city file closes with a clean split.
Glen Park and Noe Valley post the lowest violent-crime rates among the eight neighborhoods compared here. Glen Park recorded about 152 violent incidents per 100,000 residents, with Noe Valley close behind at 195 per 100,000.[7]
For low overall crime and low property crime, the quiet edge of the map holds. Sea Cliff, the Outer Sunset, and the Outer Richmond stand out.[4][6]
Check violent crime and property crime as separate signals. A neighborhood can look calm in one column and show a different pattern in the other. Busy corridors can also pull block averages upward.
Neighborhood averages flatten the street-level picture. They do not show where reports cluster on a few blocks, near a transit line, or along a retail strip. Use Aden's ZIP neighborhood and ZIP reports with the SFPD Crime Dashboard and DataSF Heat Map before committing to an address.[2][3]
That pattern fits the city map. Western, coastal, and hill neighborhoods still sit below the city baseline. In the most recent annual reporting period, about 40% of San Francisco neighborhoods recorded violent-crime rates below 5 per 1,000 residents.[4]
Check the exact address, not just the neighborhood name.
Data period: January–June 2026. Primary analysis last updated July 14, 2026. SFPD incident database last updated August 23, 2026. Verified August 24, 2026. Crime rates reflect reported incidents only and can change as reports are revised. Rates are calculated per 100,000 residents using U.S. Census population estimates.
FAQs
Which of these neighborhoods is safest for renters?
Presidio sits at the quiet end of the city map. For renters, it stands out as the safest neighborhood, with the lowest reported property crime rate in 2024 at about 6 per 1,000 residents. That low pattern holds in 2025 as well, where it remains the lowest among neighborhoods.
The same calm shows up in violent crime records. Presidio also ranks among the neighborhoods with the lowest violent-crime rates.
Are property crimes more common than violent crimes in safe areas?
Yes. In San Francisco neighborhoods, even the calmer ones, property crimes usually appear more often than violent crimes.
The pattern is plain across much of the city. In many residential areas, violent crime stays low. Theft, burglary, and motor vehicle theft show up more often per person. Even in neighborhoods with a lighter crime record, property crime usually sits above violent crime.
How can I check whether a specific block is safe?
Use the San Francisco Police Department’s official Crime Dashboard as the main case file. It lets you filter incident records and narrow the view to the trouble that matters.
For a closer street read, DataSF’s neighborhood crime heat map moves down to the block level. That’s where the city stops speaking in broad zones and starts naming corners.
The city’s open-data portal adds another layer. Incident reports there often point to intersections or nearby spots, which helps trace where police said an event happened.
One warning sits in the margins: these are reported incidents, not every incident that occurred. Some records also stay out of public view when a report is confidential.